|
SERMONS
The
Fifth Sunday in Lent
March 28, 2004
Last
Saturday I went to see Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ.
I left the theatre with very mixed feelings, some of which I'm still
sorting out. One of the things that I was most interested in seeing
was the depiction of the Jewish authorities.
As
you no doubt know, there was a good bit written about this prior
to the film's release. Personally, I was disappointed in them. They
reminded me most of some evil leaders from a second-rate fantasy
or science fiction movie. They came across-to me at any rate-as
almost ridiculously vicious caricatures, and I didn't like this.
I
didn't like it because, to a certain extent, it gets me off the
hook. I find it much more disturbing to think of the authorities
who orchestrated the crucifixion, not as evil monsters, but as good,
conscientious leaders who were trying to do the right thing in difficult
circumstances, and who went terribly, terribly wrong.
These
figures from Mel's movie come into my mind when I look at today's
gospel. Jesus tells this parable of the wicked tenants during the
last week of his earthly ministry. He has made his triumphal entry
into Jerusalem and Luke tells us that every day he teaches the people
openly in the Temple.
He
has just been involved in a disputation with the chief priests and
scribes. Now he tells the people this parable.
A
man planted a vineyard. He then leased the vineyard to tenants before
laving on a trip. Luke tells us he was gone for a long time. During
that time the tenants began to develop a certain sense of attachment
to the vineyard and its produce.
Finally
the owner sent a servant back to receive his share. But the tenants
beat the servant and threw him out. Twice more the owner sent servants
to them. Twice more they beat them and sent them away.
Finally
the owner decided to send his own son to them, thinking that, at
the least, they would respect the son. But the tenants reasoned,
"If we kill the son there will be no heir. And since the owner doesn't
seem to be coming back, the vineyard will be ours."
So
that's what they did.
Now,
Jesus asks, what will the owner do? He will come back, destroy the
tenants and give the vineyard to others.
Luke
goes on to tell us that the chief priests and scribes recognize
Jesus is telling this parable against them and want to seize him
right there. But because of the people they are afraid to.
It
is obvious that this is the way to understand this parable. The
vineyard is the people of Israel. The owner of the vineyard is God.
God placed the nation in the hands of its leaders, who have grown
greedy and covetous. So God sent prophets to call them back into
right relationship with him, but they refused to heed the message.
Now he has sent the Son, and they seek to kill him.
The
Church recognizes even more. Less than half a century after the
time of Jesus, Roman forces have destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple.
The Church sees itself as the new tenants, entrusted by God with
the care of God's people.
But
there is a danger here. There is the danger that we may look down
our noses at those mean ole wicked tenants. Just as there is the
danger of looking down our noses at the mean ole Jewish authorities
who plot to arrest and kill Jesus in The Passion of the Christ.
I'm certainly glad that I am not like them. And I know that you
are glad not to be like them as well.
But
this parable is tricky. It is a mirror. It is a mirror in which
we are called to see ourselves. A mirror in which we are called
to see how often we reject God's grace. A mirror in which we are
called to see how often we turn our back on God's call to service
and to generosity. A mirror in which we called to see how often
we claim as our own possessions the material wealth with which we
have been blessed, and how often we refuse to recognize God's claim
on our lives and our resources.
The
correct answer to the question, "Who crucified Jesus?" is, "We did."
Alan
Carpenter writes:
The
sinful impulse is insidiously dynamic. The tenants did not start
out to take the vineyard from its owner; they only wanted to keep
its produce for themselves. They did not set out to commit murder;
the first servant they only beat and sent away empty-handed. Once
committed to this path, however, they were led to its consequences.
Wanting to keep all the produce for themselves, they ended up
losing the vineyard.
The
parable's effect, therefore, is two-edged: It reminds us of our
stewardship of the vineyard God has given us, and it conveys a
prophetic warning that we not follow other false leaders by seeking
selfish ends rather than rendering to God the fruit of the vineyard
entrusted to us.
Hear,
then, the parable. We are the tenants, and we are the others to
whom the vineyard has been given. We have received as a free gift
the vineyard that others would have killed for. By God's grace,
the vineyard is twice given. So let us not close the story by
calling it "the parable of the wicked tenants." Let's leave it
open by calling it "the parable of the twice-given vineyard."
Because
we know the gospel story and have experienced it in our own lives,
we know God's love and God's boundless grace.
But
now come the final questions:
If
we are the others to whom the vineyard has been given, what will
we do with it?
Will
we be any more responsive to God's purposes than the first tenants
were?
If
so, what does obedience require of us?1
David
Christian
The Chapel of the Cross
Madison, Mississippi
1R. Alan Culpepper,
The New Interpreter's Bible.
|